Formula 1 Aerodynamics       
      
      Formula 1 is home to many trades: drivers, mechanics, 
engineers, marketers, managers etc.  However, Formula 
1 is ruled by one trade...the aerodynamicist.  
Aerodynamics is the most important aspect of a 
Formula 1 car.  The difference between the fastest and 
slowest cars on the grid, is rarely down to engine power 
or even driver skill or suspension setup.  It is down to 
how the car handles the air around it.  
Initially, the aerodynamics focused on wind resistance 
and overcoming drag, the force exerted by the air 
against the traveling car body.  Beginning in the 1920s 
and 1930s car designers began to utilize streamlining to 
smooth the outside of a car body such that air flows 
virtually undisturbed around it, increasing speeds.  In 
the 1950s the first decade of Formula 1 as an 
established sport, the cars resembled fat cigars with 
smooth streamlined shapes and gentle curves allowing 
the air to flow smoothly around the cars.  This made 
the cars fast, but soon enough the limits of these cars 
were established.
The problem encountered by a streamlined Formula 1 
car is that it doesn't travel in a straight line, or in a wide 
oval like indy cars or Nascar stock cars.  Formula 1 is 
run on a road coarse with corners or left and right turns 
of various angles and distances.  This means that the 
car must abruptly slow down, turn, and then accelerate 
over and over, some 10-20 times per lap.   Sure 
streamlining helps the car accelerate after a corner but 
it sure doesn't help it slow down or turn.  In fact, how 
fast you can take the corners, not your top speed on 
the straights, is the determining factor in a road course 
race.  
The determining factor in how fast you can take a 
corner is called grip.  The simplest definition of grip we 
know is that grip is the car's ability to stick to the road 
and go where the driver intends.  If the car doesn't go 
where the driver intends, the driver is faced with a lack 
or deficiency of grip.  Grip is what allows a driver to 
take a corner faster and faster without running of the 
track or losing control.  
This valuable commodity-grip occurs in only one place: 
where the tire meets the road, the contact patch.  The 
action between the tire and the road surface determines 
grip.  A "sticky" or soft compound tire will tend to have 
more grip than a comparable harder compound tire.  
The softer tire will wear out faster, and a worn tire has 
very little grip, so there is a cost to using tires to 
maximize grip.  
Another way to increase grip is to add weight to the 
tire.  More weight will push down on the tires contact 
patch increasing its grip.  For the same reason an 
empty pickup truck will have less grip in the snow or 
ice, than one with the bed filled with say concrete.  The 
problem with adding weight is that there is an 
associated cost, the added weight on the tire means 
that the car can't accelerate as fast or hit the same top 
speed.  Therefore, car designers needed to find a way 
to increase grip without incurring the costs of worn tires 
or added vehicle weight.  The solution came from 
turning an aerospace idea upside down.
Airplane wings through their shape utilize air pressure 
differences between the top and the bottom of the 
wing to create a force called lift-raising even a heavy 
metal airplane.  In the 1960s car designers used an 
upside down wing to create the opposite of lift, or 
downforce.  A wing traveling through the air exerts a 
powerful force in one direction, and designers aimed 
this force in the same direction as added weight to 
increase grip, but without the cost of actually adding 
the weight.  This force is stronger when the car is 
traveling faster and more grip is needed, and less when 
the car is traveling slower and the need for grip is 
reduced.  
      
      As The lift of a wing, or in the race car case downforce is 
so powerful that a modern Formula 1 car traveling at 
about 100 miles per hour generates enough downforce to 
keep it attached to the road even if the road were to 
suddenly turn upside down.  This is why Formula 1 cars 
have two obvious wing assemblies on the front and the 
rear of the car, in addition to several less obvious ones 
built into the car design.  
As the car has front wheels and rear wheels they also 
have matching wings producing downforce onto those 
wheels.  The size and position of these wings is strictly 
governed by FIA rules.  Teams have the freedom to alter 
the shape of the wings within certain areas to extract 
aerodynamic benefits.  The shape of the rear wing is 
strictly regulated but the front wing is given a great deal 
of freedom, particularly on either side of the monocoque.
In addition to the two wings the entire floor of the car is 
designed to mimic the conditions found under an inverted 
wing.  Specifically, through the use of a diffuser, a slotted 
widening opening of the undercar space at the rear of the 
car.
The diffuser speeds up airflow through it creating a low 
pressure area just in front of it.  This low pressure area 
actually acts to "suck" the bottom of the car towards the 
ground, or generating more downforce.  The bottom of 
the floor is smooth to provide the maximum airflow under 
the car and through the diffuser.  The car is also very low 
to the ground which adds to the low pressure effect.  
When air or any fliuid travels through a narrowing 
passage (like underneath the car) its speed increases and 
its pressure decreases.  The closer to car is to the ground 
the lower the pressure underneath it.
Finally, most of the other elements of the car design, are 
there to direct the flow of air to the downforce generating 
devices, the wings and the diffuser.  The design of the 
nose, the sidepods and even the suspension elements is 
all to enhance airflow to the rear wing and the diffuser.  
In the 2011 season we have seen many teams use the 
concept of blowing engine exhaust gases out of the 
tailpipes and through the diffuser to enhance the low 
pressure created.  This was pioneered by Red Bull in 2010 
and has made the RB7 the fastest car on the 2011 grid 
for the first seven races.  Blowing exhaust gas through 
the diffuser has some pitfalls, particularly when the driver 
is off throttle.  When off throttle there is less exhaust flow 
through the diffuser and less downforce generated, 
resulting in less rear grip or oversteer.  Since the driver 
must reduce throttle when entering a corner under 
braking this would cause the car to spin.
The solution to the off throttle problem is to flow air 
continuously through the exhaust and thus diffuser but 
moderate engine power through ignition timing.  Off 
throttle the ECU retards the spark until the exhaust valve 
is opening and then sparks as the piston is rising forcing 
the combustion of fuel and air to occur in the exhaust 
port and header tube.  With no combustion occurring 
during the power stroke, the engine makes no more 
power through the crankshaft, but flows just as much 
exhaust gas as under full throttle because the combustion 
occurs inside the exhaust.
The cost of using this tactic is  burnt or melted exhaust 
valves, which must now be made from a more heat 
resistant metal like titanium, or in more dramatic fashion, 
a flash fire caused by an overheated exhaust header 
burning, say a hydraulic line.  Lotus-Renault knows this 
one quite well as shown below, note the dramatic exit by 
German driver Nick Heidfeld, or Herr Heidfeld if you 
will...pun intended.  
      
      




